And then driving the "story"into a racial matter when race had absolutely no play and was inserted as cover for some overzealous people including some Warriors players and lazy sports media members.
Shumann was accused of stealing a jacket from a Warriors' team security guard (who has recently left the organization) the initial story was reported by The Athletic; did its reporter make an attempt to ask Shumann for comment? Get his explanation? Surely someone with 25 years at his employer deserves that but there was no attempt made by the reporter.
Crappy journalism.
Monte Poole, a veteran sports columnist and Warriors' Insider for the local NBC Sports Bay Area cable outlet who is African-American, wrote a column about some Warriors' players who injected race into the matter even though Shumann has never had any issues with Bay Area sports teams, let alone issues involving racial matters. I bring this up because Shumann went out of his way to return the jacket to its owner that night in San Antonio; unable to get it to the security guard, Shumann gave it to a prominent Warriors' PR person. This is verified.
There was no theft. There was, conspicuously, a video that showed Shumann taking the jacket and looking around for its owner. Should Shumann have left it there as is? You can say it might have been the best thing to do in retrospect but Shumann had no ill intentions and only wanted to get it the security guard as quickly as possible.
Yet the story had already developed a narrative that Shumann was a thief! and a white thief at that who in addition to his crime, received special treatment. Mind you the fact that Shumann's record of 25 years at KGO was spotless and that there's never been any incident whatsoever to indicate this type of behavior nor racial elements; of course it is far easier to let the story go viral; why ask questions now because that would require heavy lifting and actual reporting; let the facts rush forward and damn any explanation after all it's just a guy that has a quarter-century worth of time at his employer and livelihood on the line.
I don't know Shumann all that well; only occasionally we bumped into one another at various Warriors' games and other Bay Area sporting events. I have no vested interest in his travails here monetarily or otherwise. I believe Shumann at his word that he didn't steal any jacket and that the whole thing was a misunderstanding and that, with the assist by social media, developed a storm of its own with members never bothering to consider the facts. There is nothing to consider otherwise. If Shumann had any incidents in his life to suggest some investigation, OK, he loses the benefit of the doubt. There is no mark.
Shumann had a spotless record and was let go by ABC execs because their relationship with the Warriors involved significant monetary assets which trumped even an innocent employee in the cross hairs of a mostly benign matter that had no business going viral, literal, racial, or otherwise.
Shumann is a devoted family man with a wife and daughter in college; he's had to sell his house and painstakingly reinvent his livelihood and name. "It's a nightmare", he tells me.
I believe him.
NOTE:
If you like coming here and enjoy reading about current and past TV/Radio culture, then please CONTRIBUTE to this independent media blog that relies solely on reader contributions and donations; to donate, go to the "donate" button on the right side of the blog --just click on the "Pay Pal" button and make your contribution. It takes only a minute and will help keep 415 Media sustainable and at your service, 24/7.
I WILL PERSONALLY CALL YOU AND E-MAIL YOU THANKING YOU FOR YOUR DONATION.
THANKS TO ALL OF YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
THANKS TO ALL OF YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
Rich, you are carrying Schu's water again?
ReplyDeleteNow that's more like the column we were expecting yesterday...
ReplyDelete"Schumann is a devoted family man." Is that supposed mean anything?
ReplyDelete"and lazy sports media members"
ReplyDeleteYou mean Steve Berman (The Athletic) Timothy Rapp (Bleacher Report)?
And what adult male goes by the name of Timothy?
Schumann had every opportunity to address this issue publicly at the time AND NEVER claimed to have returned the jacket.
ReplyDeleteHow has it "been verified" that Schumann returned the jacket as Lieberman claims?
You don't appear to be the sharpest tool in the shed, but when accused of something for which you are innocent, you are better off not to grant extensive interviews with the press and who would know this any better than a member of the press. Those jailhouse interviews go further to convict the accused than they ever do to free them.
DeleteDon't know why you are insulting me. If Schumann did not steal the jacket, why wouldn't he have said so?
DeleteWhat are you and RL implying is really going on here? You are hinting at some secret agenda to get Mike Schumann, WHY?
Would appreciate a responsive answer without insults.
I don't remember anything about Shumann saying he gave the jacket to the Warriors PR person that night. If true, that would have settled the matter then and there.
Delete@3:40 "Innocent until proven guilty." I answered you @1:46.
DeleteHe was immediately accused of stealing the jacket in social media, by the Warriors, everyone has an opinion without knowing the facts. This is precisely why law enforcement keeps the details of criminal investigation largely secret. When did you ever see someone who was innocent go to the media and be exonerated? Can you give me an example? I don't think so. Perhaps KGO7 told him not to go to the media. Who knows?
I think it is really ridiculous to try people in the court of public opinion, based on social media posts, making serious decisions on knowledge of only the fragments of a situation and meting out life-changing punishment based on what can only be described as a angry lynch mob mentality.
This answer doesn't match the timing of events if the jacket was returned the same evening.
DeleteThis didn't become a matter of "public opinion" until days after the jacket had been returned. There would have been no reason to discuss the stolen jacket if it had already been returned.
What's most questionable detail here is whether the jacket was returned that evening. There is no real evidence that it was and everything to suggest it wasn't.
What evidence is there that the jacket was returned that night rather than stolen by Schumann?
Why is this story a "racial matter"? Mike Schumann stole someone's property.
ReplyDeleteYeah and if he was black and did it I'm sure it wouldn't be a racial matter LOL
DeleteHe should sue for wrongful termination. He's clearly not doing that if he's speaking to Rich which means he clearly did something wrong or can't prove he did something right!
There was a comment attributed to Andre Iguodola along the lines that if the person accused of stealing the jacket was black, he would have been immediately fired, and that Shumann shouldn't be given preferential treatment because he's white. To me, that came off as a call to fire him, irrespective of whether he was guilty or not. Iggy also was the player most involved in getting the former SF police chief fired from his new Warriors security job. So while I generally like Iggy, he does seem to view everything through a racial lens.
Delete"he does seem to view everything through a racial lens"
DeleteWhy sugar coat it. He's a flaming racist. He was raised to be. The rest of us are trying to treat people fairly, but not racists.
He was fired. If the didn't steal the jacket why would he have remained silent about it?
ReplyDeleteConfidentiality agreement Lieberman mentioned yesterday makes no sense. Schumann agreed to remain silent about exculpatory details which would have cleared his reputation and now his life is ruined. HUH?
Those details wouldn't "clear" him from being fired. Basically, if he agreed to remain silent it probably meant they gave him a severance, he got it IF he wouldn't challenge the firing. So he can take his chances in court trying to get his job back, or he can take the money and run, but if he takes the money, he can't talk about anything, whether it "clears" him or not.
DeleteIt's really a great system for protecting the guilty and screwing the innocent, because few of the innocents have pockets deep enough to challenge it (in this case, pockets deeper than those of Disney lawyers). Pay to play. Because in America, nothing talks more than money.
Anon @2:08,
DeletePlease explain, if Schumann didn't steal the jacket, why would anyone want to fire him?
When you're dealing with Blacks and White, it's always about race. Maybe it will change when Blacks stop disproportionately committing crimes at a higher level then any ethnic group(See DOJ statistics) along with being accountable for there actions and stop blaming everyone else along with being No 1 group(73%)in having babies born into single parent homes.
ReplyDeleteStatistics 13% of the population commit 80% of the crimes. Rich posts your comment but censors mine with the same facts? Crazy.
DeleteAs an example of the DOJ Stats, 13% of the population are responsible for over 51% of all murders in America. This something that should be talked about and then remedied
DeleteThank you, Rich! You are 100% spot on.
ReplyDeleteShocking to find that a supposedly reputable Bay Area news organization is being run by the Warriors ipso facto. This would definitely slant their presentation of the news. Never really trusted them anyway, and likely never will, now that my suspicions are confirmed.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if this coincides with Gary Radnich all the sudden wanting to retire in September out of the blue wondering if he sees the bayarea Media Waters are getting roughe!!!!
ReplyDeleteAnother notch in your desk, Trixie.
ReplyDeleteAmen. She is the devil in disguise
DeleteHow come we have not heard a peep from Schumann's talent agent?
ReplyDeleteIsn't the agent supposed to protect the client? Or did Schu just allow his agent to write a crappy contract allowing termination in a BS windbreaker theft?
I would sue the Warriors, The former security dick...ABC and his agent.
Sue em all....let the 9th circuit sort it all out.
who says he has a talent agent? These days many on air types even in big markets dont have or want an agent. agents are often pretty useless.
DeleteWell smarty...
DeleteIf he doesn't have an agent, he can't sue him.
You win!
lol
Does Poole believe Shu?
ReplyDeleteAny response at all from ex-49er teammates?
Need to have the other side explain their take more clearly.
And why is Trixie still at Circle7?
I called bullsh|t from the first day. Someone at Warriors and/or KGO wanted him gone for whatever reason, and the incident gave him/her/them an excuse. In an industry that crawls with creeps and cowards, it happens all the time.
ReplyDeleteExcellent work, Rich.
Whatever happened to "presumed innocent until proven guilty"? Does not appear that Schumann was given due process.
ReplyDeleteThank you Rich, this is exactly what I mentioned two days ago. But of course I got jumped on for it - by people too lazy to do their research
ReplyDeleteHad it been Monte Poole involved in the incident would he hav been so quickly terminated?
ReplyDeleteYou know the answer and why.....No!!!
DeleteAccording to Berman's report:
ReplyDelete"Despite Shumann's attempts to apologize to several members of the team, and ABC7 sending him home from San Antonio after the incident—he was not part of ABC7's postgame show on Sunday"
Why did Shumann apologize if he gave back the jacket that night, this makes no sense at all.
Rich, since you're helping him get his story out there, please answer.
Appreciate trying to get more facts and calling this out as a rush to judgment (either direction).
ReplyDeleteWhat confuses me...
If he returned it to the PR director that evening, why was he sent home from covering the game before the incident was broken in the media?
What time of day did he take the jacket?
What time of day did the team members know of the video / taking of the jacket?
What time of day did he return it to the PR rep?
Agree 9:30, this details here raise more questions than answers.
DeleteVery simply, if Schumann returned the jacket, why was he fired?
The story suggests various people conspiring against Schumann, who?
And why would Schumann remain silent about NOT STEALING the jacket if he hadn't?
My conclusion:
DeleteIf a guy who can speak to the public is accused of stealing something AND NEVER DENIES IT, even after being fired for stealing, he STOLE IT.
No other reasonable explanation.