Saturday, December 30, 2023

It Took SF Gate Four Hours to Post Story About Slain Oakland PD Officer

A GOOD 4! (Four) hours after news alreay broke that a OPD police officer was shot and killed, SFGate finally had a story up.

Finally.

The Chronicle's flimsy Internet site is a joke.

Nothing new here. Quote me.

17 comments:

  1. Why would SFGate report on a Bay Area police officer killed in the line of duty when they have more important stories to publish, such as their latest iteration of the top 10 burritos in the Bay Area, the best boba tea in the East Bay and a detailed write up about a house in the Mission that was recently painted purple? Oh, and dare I forget their journalistic masterpiece about what's in and what's out when it comes to tech bro fashion. You can't make this up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Serious question: Is SFgate a news website? I've always thought of it as a lifestyle website with lighter stories, not hard news.

      Delete
  2. As of 4:40pm these are the top stories on the SF Gate website:

    "These are the touristy SF restaurants actually worth visiting"

    "I signed my life away to eat this hot chicken"

    "Why one of the greatest Bay Area movies ever made is getting memed with 'LOTR'"

    What a fucking joke.

    ReplyDelete
  3. As an FYI, The San Francisco Chronicle is not the same as SFGate. They split into 2 separate companies with separate newsrooms and editorial staffs about 5 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  4. SFGATE isn't about news, or timely delivery thereof. It's the "Chron's" on-line advertising arm ... nothing more.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Last night four San Francisco police officers were injured in the line of duty and transported to the hospital. Not a single mention of it on sfgate.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When you website editor is in Utah, their assistant is in Vegas, their copy writer in Bakersfield, and the burrito guide is in Arizona, what do you expect? Lightspeed additions to yesterdays sports scores?
    There is a reason it is called “The Comicle” by those in the know.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Equally disappointing - local newscasts leading with weather related stories as opposed to officer killed in the line of duty. SMH

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh God, we heard about the cop all day. It was sufficiently covered—by everyone (on TV at least).

      Delete
  8. I haven’t been to their site in a few years. I don’t miss it at all.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Going to sfgate.com for news would be like going to fidelity.com for sports scores.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Rich, are you surprised?

    ReplyDelete
  11. And zero mention of the subsequent crash across the bay that injured 4 SFPD officers, which other media outlets are reporting was related to the OPD shooting death. But fear not, Sfgate has the following clickbait headline above the fold, 'The best Bay Area restaurant dishes SFGATE staff ate in 2023.'

    ReplyDelete
  12. Here's a clue: In the first four hours after such an event, cops haven't released much more information than that a cop or anyone else was shot and killed. There isn't any substance about name, situation, suspects etc. for at least that long

    ReplyDelete
  13. What do you expect? SFGate is a pathetic rag operated by a bunch of 20-something and millennial wannabe social media influencers who know absolutely nothing about the Bay Area. Most are obsessed with their own individual follower counts and finding ways to grow their individual “brands.”

    As far as website content, most decisions as to what to publish on the website are based on popularity contests and who’s fucking and sucking who. The hallmarks of their website include plagiarism and various blatant violations of every journalistic standard imaginable.

    I should know. I worked there and left as it began to go down the toilet. No one expected them to spiral into the abyss as quickly as they did, yet here we are.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wait SFGate reports on news?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If by news you’re referring to the latest wet burrito that their staff ‘discovered,’ then yes.

      Delete