You would think KGO Radio, the alleged "news-talk" radio talker would be all over this, a red-meat galore for discussion and debate, right? You would be wrong. KGO's hosts would prefer to talk about their kids, (Medoro), Florida weirdness (Thompson) (again), and sweet nothings. Pat Thurston came close with a Jan. 6th/'21 segment, but close only counts in horse shoes.
Well, I have zero interest in Hillary Clinton. To me, she embodies everything that is wrong with our Government and politics. She has made two attempts at becoming President and failed both times. What makes her think the third time will be a charm is beyond me. I know Biden is polling very low and he has several gaffes in his Presidential resume thus far and Kamala cannot seem to lose the nervous twitch cackle at the most inopportune times, but if Hillary happens to be a consensus best option for 2024 for the Democrat party, they are in worse shape than I thought. Personally, I think Hillary needs to find a hobby and get out of politics. Although, that seems rather unlikely judging from her continued talk show appearances.
ReplyDeleteThose super-educated, Ivy League and Harvard Law educated women who have been US Senators and Secy's of State don't have much interest in hobbies. Why would you think she would?
DeleteHillary Clinton went to Yale Law. Michelle Obama went to Harvard Law. Melanoma Trump, also known as FLOTITS, went to dominatrix college.
Delete@5:03 - No, I know that won't happen because Hillary's hobby is Hillary and politics. One thing that has stuck with me about the 2016 election in regards to her is how she told Trump that once he lost that he should accept defeat with grace and move on. Funny how she hasn't followed her own advice and it has been four, now five years of sour grapes and excuses on why she lost.
Delete5:03 "super-educated, Ivy League and Harvard Law educated women who have been US Senators and Secy's of State don't have much interest in hobbies".
DeleteYou left out egotistical, maniacal, power hungry, elitist.
Miklo, as opposed to how Trump handled losing? Are you f'ing kidding me? She called him on election night and conceded, something Trump STILL hasn't done and NEVER will. Get a grip.
Delete@9:12 - First, I am no Trump fan either. We could go tit for tat between the two. Yes, Trump has spewed election nonsense ad nauseam. And Yes, Hillary conceded the election but she (and the Democrat party) also spent the next four years perpetuating Russian collusion - with much of it centered around a bought and paid for dossier with questionable sources and motives. Additionally, Hillary has at every opportunity complained about our electoral process and how winning the popular vote should matter more. She has hardly displayed much grace post loss. Imho. Personally, I think there are some good in each party but a vast majority are power craven egotists.
Deletewhy would Pat talk about Hillary? She did her best to wound Hillary Clinton, in favor of the socialist who had no chance to beat Trump. Remember?
ReplyDeleteInteresting? Only if you like very old, rewarmed up slop. She is toxic and should be nowhere near the White House again.
ReplyDeleteHillary Clinton is younger than Donnie, right?
Delete5:01 so is Miley Cyrus, what's your point?
Delete"Hillary Clinton is younger than Donnie, right?"
DeleteWho cares. Both should be put down by the nearest vet.
I vividly remember the workman’s comp lawyer predicting that Hillary would be elected President, and that Obama should be VP “to get experience.” The lawyer’s lapdog said “Yes!!!” to her every word.
ReplyDeleteThere is no such thing as "workman's comp". I never predicted Hillary would be president. I wanted her to be, as did most voters in the 2016 election. She won the popular vote, didn't you know? I'm guessing you really tremble in the presence of really smart women.
DeleteYou most certainly did, Christine. You said it on one of your sub assignments on KGO. I specifically remember you saying it.
DeleteThen afterwards, you and the Diva living in Vegas wanted Obama to serve under Hillary.
I tremble under no one, Christine. On that note, have a good night.
"I'm guessing you really tremble in the presence of really smart women."
DeleteI don't. And Shillery isn't smart. She's a bigmouth with a quick temper...something liberals often mistake for intelligence. A smart statement has never come out of her mouth. Ditto the rest of them. Anyone with brains wouldn't run. Why bother, when Washington is the place for the dumb and corrupt.
Christine,you know very well that is not how the game is played. The Electoral College decides. Let's not pretend there are not a huge number of Trump supporters in blue states like California that do not bother to vote as it is winner-take-all.If we went by popular vote, that Hillary popular vote margin that you cite significantly narrows. Let's thank Trump for developing the vaccine in record time when Dr Fauci said it would take 2 years. All the while your favourite Biden literally hid in the basement, doing nothing. You are so silly!
DeleteYou are jumping to the climax, without the foreplay. I made no assertion that she had won the needed electoral votes. I merely stated the undisputed fact that she won the popular vote in 2016.Do you not understand how one can win the popular vote and still lose the election? I would not have chosen Biden as the democratic candidate in 2020.
DeleteDear Boris at 7:19. I absolutely did prefer Clinton to Obama way back in 2008(her first run). Both were good choices. I must have made quite an impact on you way back then that you remember it so specifically. As for 8:31's assertion that Hillary Clinton isn't "smart", ivy league college valedictorian, Yale Law honors, named one of top 100 litigators in US,US Senate-two terms, Secretary of State appointed by man who beat her in 2008 primary. Are you saying Obama wasn't "smart", either?
DeleteI still laugh my ass off when I think about her smashing her cake against the wall when she found out Trump won the Election, believe me I'm no Trump supporter but I've never cared for Hillary or BJ Clinton.
ReplyDelete5.10 PM
DeleteWord was, somebody left her cake out in the rain!
I'm guessing she is involved in this lame trial balloon. What is she thinking with her fingerprints on the Steele Dossier and Bill's frequent flyer miles on the Lolita Express?
ReplyDeleteWhen Clinton left office as Sec of State her approval ratings were high 60s, then when it appeared she would run in 2016 Republicans went after her with 8 or 9 phony hearings on Benghazi...
DeleteIn the words of a great man, "Nobody...and I mean NOBODY...cares".
ReplyDeleteWhy the hell would anyone believe that old hag is running again?! And if she is, she'll be a spot on the wall in three months. I'm no Trump fan, but I believe he could easily beat her.
ReplyDeleteFrankly, the Dems have no one. They were all banking on Kamala, because she's got melanin, and the DNC still strategizes like this is the 1980s.
Although liberal I was not a big Hilary Clinton fan, I did like her as First Lady, and she was fine as a senator. She lost a couple of times trying to run for President, so I'm not in favor of her running again. How about some new blood. My girl friend is a strong Bernie supporter, could not stand Hilary, said she hated her and she is a war monger, so no all liberals like her, she has been portrayed by the right wing as extremely liberal, but to many is not. Just for the record I'm not a Bernie fan, I would like someone more middle of the road, and definitely someone not in their seventies, preferable in the forties, fifties or sixties. Oh by the way I'm in my seventies.
ReplyDeleteIf the Democrats weren't so focused on ideology over winning, they'd jettison coastal Progressive wokeism and move to the center with a candidate that could win the blue collar vote in Ohio, and appeals to working class Obama-Trump voters rather than mocking them. They'll never do that, and they STILL don't care to understand the millions of "flyover" Americans who switched from Obama to Trump, so they will lose to any GOP candidate in 2024.
ReplyDeleteYou must have missed the fact that democrats won in 2020 with a super centrist candidate, Mr. Biden.
DeleteI wouldn't mind it if she ran, she'd be much better than Biden or especially Trump, but it ain't going to happen...I'll bet on it.
ReplyDeleteHillary won't run. Right-wingers are obsessed with her, which is why right-wing media sites so often talk about her. The Drudge Report is hardly the place to go for serious issues of the day.
ReplyDeleteYou are so right. Even after Trump won and months later, didn't matter when you turned into the Sean Hannity show, you could make a bet that he would mention Hilary. I'm not a listener to the Hannity show, but I would occassionally turn to his show for a few minutes, I all I heard was Hilary, Hilary.
ReplyDeleteHillary Clinton was the most qualified candidate for the top office that this country has ever had.
ReplyDeleteEnough of this country was afraid of her and we ended up with 4 years of Trump with that end result still poisoning our nation.
"I merely stated the undisputed fact that she won the popular vote in 2016."
ReplyDeleteYou are correct Christine but this is not relevant to anything. You play the game according to the rules. Change the Constitution if you do not like it. Trump did not even campaign in CA and other blue states and would have significantly narrowed, or even won, the popular vote margin if the election was decided by national popular vote.
Biden was dead in the water and totally lucked out when the (D) frontrunners Bernie, Liz, Mayor Pete and others were convinced to drop out by the establishment.
If Biden does not run, and it was a choice between Kamala and Hillary, whom would you support Christine? We have someone that received 1% of the vote from her own party but she is the right color. It is her time.
Trump ran for President in 2000 and only received 15,000 votes in California. He ended up becoming POTUS (with major help from Russia) in 2016. Your point being...?
DeleteI'm not now, nor have I ever been a Kamala Harris supporter.She was a mediocre DA in SF, a mediocre AG in California, a mediocre presidential candidate. She was chosen for obvious reasons, to help secure the minority vote. There is nothing wrong with that sort of thinking about veep choices, and dems had to defeat the orange vulgarian. I get it. That still doesn't make her brilliant, an original thinker, or someone who should be president.
DeleteI totally agree with Christine's views regarding Harris. I'm no fan of either Hillary or Harris, but I'd vote for either of them over Trump.
Delete